Evidence Library · Leadership Pathways & Outcomes

Higher CEO-reported burnout was associated with lower firm EBITA

Peer-reviewed researchPeer reviewed

External empirical finding · Supporting · 2018

Higher CEO-reported burnout was associated with lower firm EBITA

Among 156 CEOs of large Swedish firms, higher self-reported burnout was associated with lower firm performance, measured using average EBITA from official records. The negative association was weaker when the CEO also chaired the board and when firms had greater resource availability, but stronger in larger firms.

Research basis

Cross-sectional observational study. 156 chief executives of Swedish firms.

What it supports

Direct leader-population evidence linking a psychological-capacity-related measure with firm performance and showing contextual moderation.

Boundary

The study was observational and cannot establish whether burnout affected performance, poorer performance contributed to burnout, or another factor influenced both. Burnout was self-reported, but the financial outcome was independently sourced.

BOL relevance

Addresses the evidence gap between a leader-level capacity-related measure and a distal company outcome, while retaining strong causal boundaries.

Source class

Peer-reviewed research

Role in BOL

Supporting

Population context

Leaders or executives

Evidence basis

Administrative or register outcomes with measured or self-reported exposures

Sample

156 CEOs

Endpoint

Average firm EBITA for 2007 and 2008 obtained from Statistics Sweden

CEOburnoutfirm performancepsychological capacity

Source record checked 26 July 2026.

This entry is part of the Bio-Optimized Leadership™ Evidence Library. Each claim states its research basis, what the source supports, what it does not support, and how it relates to the BOL model.